Module: | Kalam's Early Life & Maternal Lineage
Q30: Consider the following statements regarding Jainulabdeens psychological interpretation of human distress:
1. When people came to Jainulabdeen to propitiate demonic forces, he validated their superstitions by confirming that literal demons were attacking them.
2. Jainulabdeen understood these "demonic forces" as manifestations of internal human distress, fear, and psychological suffering.
3. He advocated that individuals should eventually look inward to identify the "enemy of fulfillment" within themselves rather than relying on external mediators.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
2. Jainulabdeen understood these "demonic forces" as manifestations of internal human distress, fear, and psychological suffering.
3. He advocated that individuals should eventually look inward to identify the "enemy of fulfillment" within themselves rather than relying on external mediators.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
✅ Correct Answer: B
🎯 Quick Answer:
Statements 2 and 3 are correct. He viewed demonic forces as internal psychological distress and urged self-reflection.Structural Breakdown: Jainulabdeens approach involves diagnosing the true problem (internal distress disguised as external demons) and prescribing the ultimate cure (internal introspection and self-reliance). Historical/Related Context: This aligns with modern psychoanalytical interpretations of ancient religious practices, where rituals of exorcism or propitiation are seen as primitive methods of dealing with acute anxiety and mental health crises.
Jainulabdeen possessed an intuitive grasp of this psychology.
Causal Reasoning: Statement 1 is incorrect because Jainulabdeen did not validate literal demons; he believed this was "not a correct approach at all" and tried to shift their perspective from external superstition to internal emotional management.